It seems the US District court in Sacramento upheld the microstamping requirements (shocker, an Obama appointee).
The case is Pena v. Cid, 09-cv-01185, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California (Sacramento)
http://ift.tt/1zqXql1
Technology that is so easily defeated is totally worthless. It's a poll tax if there ever was one. The logic that a defacto ban on all new handguns does not infringe on 2A rights is the most ridiculous thing I have seen in quite a while. Are there any manufacturers planning to implement this?
The case is Pena v. Cid, 09-cv-01185, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California (Sacramento)
http://ift.tt/1zqXql1
Technology that is so easily defeated is totally worthless. It's a poll tax if there ever was one. The logic that a defacto ban on all new handguns does not infringe on 2A rights is the most ridiculous thing I have seen in quite a while. Are there any manufacturers planning to implement this?
California microstamping upheld
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire